Last Updated:
September 12, 2007

University of Missouri-Columbia to change its name again

by Emily Schmidt, posted Sept. 12, 2007

The University of Missouri-Columbia plans to restore its name back to the University of Missouri dropping the “dash Columbia” from its official name. All of these efforts are in hopes to be the cornerstone University of Missouri, according to the MU Web site.

In 1963, “Columbia” was added to emphasize the location of the university commonly known as MU or Mizzou. Other campuses with regional designations include the University of Missouri-Kansas City, the University of Missouri-Rolla and the University of Missouri-St. Louis, all of which are part of the University of Missouri System.

The proposition for the MU name change was brought up by the National Campaign Steering Committee on May 2, 2007, according to the MU Web site. The group, which is made up of 57 MU alumni and friends who raise money for the University, proposed the “dash Columbia” be deleted.

Since then, several other groups have voiced support for “Columbia” to be deleted. Some of the groups, including the Mizzou Alumni Association, MU faculty council, staff advisory council, MU Council of Deans and the MU Retirees Association, support the original claim to delete “Columbia,” according to MU name restoration on the MU Web site.

Paul Ross, a sophomore journalism student, believes the name should be restored back to its original name.

“We were founded to be the University of Missouri,” Ross said. “We were the first university in the system and we finally earned our title back.”

Although a proposition, some students on the MU campus are unaware of the name restoration initiative. Courtney Johnson, an MU freshman, was unaware of the proposition.

“It doesn’t really affect me,” Johnson said. “We will always be Mizzou.”

Emily Evans, a freshman studying political science, was unaware “Columbia” was a part of the University’s official title.

“I thought we were just the University of Missouri,” Evans said. “I mean there is Rolla, UMKC and UMSL. I didn’t even know Mizzou was part of that particular system.”

Another school in the UM System has recently selected a new name. The University of Missouri-Rolla has changed its name three times in the past 50 years. Established as the Missouri School of Mines in the 1870s, the campus became the University of Missouri-Rolla in 1964 when the UM System was established. In 2008, the university’s name will become the Missouri University of Science and Technology.

Missouri State University in Springfield, Mo., recently changed its name from Southwest Missouri University because of the changing structure of the institution, according to MSU’s Web site.

Staci Nelson, an MSU sophomore studying speech pathology, attends MSU on a running scholarship.

“A lot of students wouldn’t be here if we were still Southwest Missouri State University,” Nelson said. “Missouri State is more of a regional title and makes us feel like a bigger school.”

Jan Dauve, professor of agricultural economics, director of undergraduate studies and adviser chair at MU, believes the MU name should be changed once and for all to make the University a statewide school as opposed to a regional one.

“We need to set ourselves apart from competing schools, especially MSU,” Dauve said. “Right now we have a regional school name but we have a statewide school mission; getting rid of Columbia will make it the main University of Missouri campus.”

MU believes the name change will have a positive effect on the University as a whole. Chancellor Brady Deaton said Aug. 7, 2007, to the Columbia Daily Tribune: “At a time when regionalism has been so prevalent in the state of Missouri, it is important that the state realizes our university, our campus, is not a regional institution. To have any designation that tends to localize it or suggest that it’s not the statewide institution is, in a sense, demeaning to the most significant statewide university in the state.”

Joe Parcell, an assistant professor in the department of agricultural economics, has a strong personal opinion about the restoration.

“I do believe the change is necessary for two reasons… First, MU is the state university of Missouri,” Parcell said. “MU should not be confined to a geographic area. The UM System was formed some 40 years ago with a specific agenda. Today, the higher education environment has changed and so has MU's role within, and value to, Missouri…The name restoration will help clear up the confusion.”

Both Deaton and Parcell agree the MU name restoration is the best option for MU today. Changing internal and external structures within both the university and the UM System have prompted such actions.

{back to homepage}